Case 2501267/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Simpson v Top to Toe Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501267/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Simpson brought claims against Top to Toe Ltd for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay. The judgment records that the respondent did not resist the claim, and the tribunal was satisfied, under rule 21(2) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, that a proper determination could be made on the available information.
The tribunal held that the claim for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay succeeded and entered judgment for the claimant in the sum of £715.10. The reasons do not break that figure down between the holiday pay and notice pay elements, and no further findings or remedy components are set out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay succeeded, but it does not apportion the £715.10 between the two heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay succeeded, but it does not apportion the £715.10 between the two heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £715
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21(2) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.