Case 2501268/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Seton Rogers v Aerospace Metrology & Electromechanical Calibration Limited RECORD OF A HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 2501268/2024
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Seton Rogers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote final hearing of Mrs K Seton Rogers' claim against Aerospace Metrology & Electromechanical Calibration Limited before Employment Judge T Brown on 19 March 2025. The claimant was not present or represented. The respondent was represented by Mr L Baker, consultant. The tribunal had a 72-page bundle and a witness statement for Mr Steve Oxborough from the respondent, but no papers from the claimant.
The claim had been listed for final hearing on three occasions. The judgment records that the claimant had previously sought a postponement, had attended the 15 November 2024 hearing, and knew the case had been relisted for 19 March 2025. On 18 March 2025, after business hours, she emailed the tribunal copying the respondent and said she had not been able to get out of work the following day and asked for the hearing to be rescheduled.
The judge caused the claimant to be contacted on the morning of the hearing and delayed the start until 10:25am so that she could join, even briefly, to deal with her postponement request. The claimant did not attend or communicate further. The respondent said there had been no compliance by the claimant with the case management orders made by Employment Judge O'Dempsey on 15 November 2024, and the judge found that the claimant had not provided documents, a witness statement, or a quantified claim despite earlier directions.
Applying rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the judge dismissed the claim because the claimant had failed to attend and the tribunal had insufficient information to decide the case in her absence. The reasons note that the judge considered there might have been valid criticisms of the respondent's handling of wages, but concluded that dismissal was appropriate given the claimant's repeated non-attendance, late postponement request, and failure to comply with the tribunal's orders.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant did not attend the final hearing. The judgment did not determine the underlying merits and did not identify the individual legal causes of action in the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.