Case 2501273/2022 · Employment Tribunal
D Belshaw and others (see schedule) v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501273/2022
- Decision date
- 17 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Belshaw and others (see schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants complained under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that Testerworld Limited failed to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of their dismissals. The respondent's administrators consented to the claims continuing, and the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal decided the claims could be determined on the available material under Rule 21.
The tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at each of several listed depots or sites. The claimants were employees assigned to those sites or depots and were dismissed as redundant on 9 May 2022. The tribunal found there was no recognised independent trade union for the relevant employees, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and no elected representatives for section 188 purposes; the respondent had not invited affected employees to elect such representatives.
The tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 and had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and the guidance in GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, the tribunal found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, and made the maximum protective award of 90 days' remuneration for each claimant from 9 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 alleging failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements; judgment made a protective award equivalent to 90 days' remuneration for each claimant, but no monetary figure was specified. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.