Case 2501282/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Dixon v Arron Curer — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501282/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden. The
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss Dixon's claim. Employment Judge Loy recorded that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had been given until 25 August 2023 to explain why Employment Judges Aspden and Sweeney were wrong to think she had not made a claim within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
The reasons state that the claimant's communications addressed other matters but did not deal with the specific issue ordered by EJ Aspden. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings on the underlying dispute are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
No remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action in the extracted text. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success and because the claimant did not address the issue ordered by Employment Judge Aspden regarding whether she had made a claim within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.