Case 2501316/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ewelina Golba (2) Karl Belshaw v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501316/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ewelina Golba (2) Karl Belshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response, and decided the complaints could be determined on the available material. The administrators had consented to the claims continuing.
The Tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Shortwood Business Park, Barnsley depot. The claimants were employees assigned to that depot and were dismissed as redundant on 18 May 2022. There were no recognised trade union representatives, no existing employee representatives authorised to receive information and consultation, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes; the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect such representatives.
The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 in respect of the claimants' dismissals, had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable, and that the complaints were presented in time. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, the Tribunal found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, and made the maximum protective award of 90 days' remuneration beginning on 18 May 2022 for each claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for alleged failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of redundancy dismissals. The judgment awarded 90 days' remuneration to each claimant but did not state monetary amounts. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.