Case 2501318/2023 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs S Patterson (2) Miss N Patterson v Miramar 246 Limited (In voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501318/2023
- Decision date
- 14 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs S Patterson (2) Miss N Patterson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found Mrs S Patterson's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered MiraMar 246 Ltd to pay £270.40. It also found her complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations in relation to holiday pay well founded and ordered payment of £343.20.
Miss N Patterson's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and breach of the Working Time Regulations (holiday pay) were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment says she withdrew them because she had issued another claim in the same tribunal, case no. 2501321/23, which included unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay, so there was duplication between the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs S Patterson. The tribunal found this complaint well founded and ordered payment of £270.40. | Upheld | — | £270 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs S Patterson. The tribunal found this complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations (holiday pay) well founded and ordered payment of £343.20. | Upheld | — | £343 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Miss N Patterson. Dismissed upon withdrawal because she had issued another claim in case 2501321/23 including overlapping claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Miss N Patterson. Dismissed upon withdrawal because she had issued another claim in case 2501321/23 including overlapping holiday pay claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £614
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.