Case 2501327/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v D and E — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501327/2018
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs D Winter, Mrs S Mee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Teesside Justice Centre on 6 January 2020 before Employment Judge Shore, with Mrs D Winter and Mrs S Mee sitting as lay members. The claimant appeared in person. The first respondent did not appear; the second respondent was in person.
The tribunal recorded that the first respondent had been dissolved on 1 October 2019. As a result, it held that it had no jurisdiction to hear any claim against that respondent and struck out all claims against the first respondent in their entirety under Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the first respondent had been dissolved on 1 October 2019 and struck out all claims against it for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the first respondent had been dissolved on 1 October 2019 and struck out all claims against it for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal recorded that the first respondent had been dissolved on 1 October 2019 and struck out all claims against it for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 37(1)(a). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.