Case 2501341/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Vine v Ultimate Moto Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501341/2024
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Vine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Vine brought a claim against Ultimate Moto Limited for unpaid holiday pay. The hearing took place at Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre via CVP on 27 August 2024 before Employment Judge Langridge, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr M Turnbull.
The tribunal held that the holiday pay claim was presented outside the 3 month time limit under the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought in time.
On that basis, the claim was dismissed. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and no separate written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the unpaid holiday pay claim was not brought within the 3 month time limit under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- 3 month time limit under the Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.