Case 2501356/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brian Scott v Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Limited HELD at Newcastle Hearing Centre — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501356/2024
- Decision date
- 23 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brian Scott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Brian Scott brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Limited. The case was heard at Newcastle Hearing Centre on 21 and 22 October 2024 before Employment Judge Johnson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal's judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded. No written reasons were provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing and the note indicates that written reasons would only follow if requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure.
The only recorded outcome is that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award, and no split remedy figures are given.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.