Case 2501366/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Faye Hanley v Elite Hair & Beauty (North East) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501366/2020
- Decision date
- 6 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Faye Hanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUpon the respondent confirming that it did not intend to resist the claimant's claim, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant.
The tribunal recorded that the redundancy pay claim succeeded in the sum of £152.14, the holiday pay claim succeeded in the sum of £836.82, and the notice pay claim succeeded in the sum of £152.14.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim for redundancy pay succeeds in this sum after the respondent confirmed it did not intend to resist the claim. | Upheld | — | £152 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for holiday pay succeeds in this sum after the respondent confirmed it did not intend to resist the claim. | Upheld | — | £837 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as notice pay; classified as breach of contract because notice pay is not a separate locked claim_type enum. | Upheld | — | £152 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,141
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.