Case 2501377/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Twinn v Elite Hair & Beauty (North East) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501377/2020
- Decision date
- 13 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Twinn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £546.75.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1425.56. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, awarding £1853.23 for that claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £546.75. | Upheld | — | £547 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1425.56. | Upheld | — | £1,426 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awards £1853.23. | Upheld | — | £1,853 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,826
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.