Case 2501392/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jackson Respondent 1: P T Ranson Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) Respondent 2: Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mr P Sony (non-legal representative) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501392/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jackson Respondent 1: P T Ranson Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) Respondent 2: Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle CFCTC on 28 September 2023 before Employment Judge Johnson. The claimant, Mr A Jackson, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Sony. The written judgment records that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing.
In the written decision, the tribunal held that Mr Jackson's complaint of failure to make a redundancy payment was not well founded and was dismissed. It also held that his complaint of breach of contract, described as a failure to make notice pay, was not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any further reasoning in the written reasons note.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.