Case 2501397/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Maddox v Cathedral Pallet Trucks — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501397/2020
- Decision date
- 12 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Maddox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Maddox brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages against Cathedral Pallet Trucks, alleging unpaid overtime on dates between 28 January and 18 March 2020. The tribunal applied section 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It heard evidence from the claimant and from Mr Trott for the respondent. The claimant relied on his contract of employment, diary extracts, timesheets and emails; the respondent produced no documents for the hearing.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence for 28 January, 3 February, 13 February and 4 March 2020. It found that he had worked additional hours on those dates, including early starts, workshop attendance and travel connected with the work, and that he was entitled to overtime for those periods. It was satisfied with the claimant's oral evidence and the supporting diary entries, and on 4 March it accepted that he had gone into the workshop at 4.45am, meaning half an hour that had been deducted should have been paid.
The tribunal rejected the remaining claimed dates because it was not satisfied that overtime had been worked beyond the claimant's normal working day and travel time. It found that on the other disputed dates the evidence showed he had returned home within his normal travelling time or had finished the job with sufficient time to do so. The conclusions section refers once to 11 March, although the detailed factual discussion addresses 7 March; the overall result remained that only part of the overtime claim succeeded.
The claimant had claimed £85 in overtime. The tribunal awarded £60 as a well-founded unlawful deduction from wages claim. The judgment does not set out a separate split between dates in the monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claim in part, finding overtime was due for 28 January, 3 February, 13 February and 4 March 2020. The reasons section refers once to 11 March, although the detailed discussion addresses 7 March; the overall award was £60. | Upheld | — | £60 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £60
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.