Case 2501405/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Jacqueline Daly v County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501405/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- P Wright, D Winter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jacqueline Daly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Newcastle Employment Tribunal, sitting in North Shields, from 1 to 4 December 2020 before Employment Judge Sweeney with panel members P Wright and D Winter.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal were not well founded. The proceedings were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of disability discrimination was not well founded and dismissed; no written reasons are provided in the supplied decision. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed; no written reasons are provided in the supplied decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.