Case 2501407/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Clare Healey v Loyal Care Centre Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501407/2019
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Clare Healey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sweeney heard the case with Mr Simon Taylor, solicitor, appearing for the claimant and no appearance for the respondent. The tribunal held that the claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded and succeeded.
The judgment records that a protective award was made in respect of employees based at Rowlandson House, 1-2 Rowlandson Terrace, Sunderland who were dismissed as redundant by the respondent on or about 18 January 2019. It also ordered the respondent to pay remuneration to the claimant for the protected period. The protected period was stated to begin on 18 January 2019 and to last for 90 days. No monetary figure was set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well founded. It made a protective award for employees based at Rowlandson House, 1-2 Rowlandson Terrace, Sunderland who were dismissed as redundant on or about 18 January 2019, and ordered remuneration for the claimant for the protected period, which began on 18 January 2019 and lasted 90 days. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- protective award
- protected period of 90 days
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.