Case 2501423/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jones v Conduit Construction Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501423/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Jones, brought a complaint against Conduit Construction Limited alleging unlawful deductions from wages. Employment Judge Aspden, sitting alone at Newcastle by video on 29 September 2020, upheld the complaint under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made deductions from the claimant's wages in contravention of section 13 and ordered the respondent to pay £480, being the amount deducted. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would follow unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint well founded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of the deducted sum. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £480
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.