Case 2501451/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Beveridge v Let Me Play Limited Heard: Remotely (by video link) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501451/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Beveridge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's claim against Let Me Play Limited remotely by video link on 27, 28 and 29 September 2021 before Employment Judge S Shore. The only claim identified in the liability judgment was automatic unfair dismissal for the reason or principal reason that the claimant made a series of protected disclosures, brought under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal decided that the claim was not well founded and dismissed it. No remedy findings were recorded in this liability judgment.
The judgment notes that the hearing was remote, that the parties did not object to that format, and that a face-to-face hearing was not practicable because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal found it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.