Case 2501469/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Boswell v NZR Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501469/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Boswell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal at Central London on 24 August 2021 dealt with three matters in this judgment. It held that the unfair dismissal complaint could not be heard because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous service, so that complaint was struck out for want of jurisdiction.
The Tribunal also dealt with the wages complaint. It recorded that the complaint of unpaid wages had been satisfied and that no further amount was outstanding, so that complaint was dismissed.
The judgment states that the Claimant's complaints of sexual orientation discrimination would proceed. No substantive finding on those discrimination complaints is recorded in this decision, and no remedy is set out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint because the Claimant did not have two years' continuous service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal recorded that the complaint of unpaid wages had been satisfied and that no further amount was outstanding. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant's complaints of sexual orientation discrimination proceed; no substantive determination is made in this decision. | Other | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.