Case 2501471/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Daniel Ludgate Second Claimant: Mr Steven Wilkinson v Cenergist Ltd (in administration) — 2026
- Case reference
- 2501471/2025
- Decision date
- 2 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Daniel Ludgate Second Claimant: Mr Steven Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found well-founded the complaints of Mr Daniel Ludgate and Mr Steven Wilkinson that Cenergist Ltd (in administration) failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The respondent did not appear and was not represented at the hearing on 2 July 2026.
A protective award was made for each claimant. Under section 189(4) of the 1992 Act, the protected period was set at 90 days beginning on 25 July 2025. The judgment did not state a monetary value for the awards; reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal made a protective award for both claimants, with a protected period of 90 days beginning on 25 July 2025. No monetary value was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(4) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.