Case 2501482/2021 · Employment Tribunal
COLIN PENNOCK v Booker Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501482/2021
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RODGER
- Venue
- NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE CIVIL AND FAMILY TRIBUNAL CENTRE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
COLIN PENNOCK
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rodger, sitting alone, heard the case at Newcastle upon Tyne Civil and Family Tribunal Centre on 24 and 25 March 2022. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the claimant's claim against the respondent was not well-founded and was dismissed. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text, and the judgment states that written reasons would only be provided if requested by a party within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. The claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claimant's claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. The claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing category supplied in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.