Case 2501491/2022 · Employment Tribunal
R Illingworth v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501491/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
R Illingworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's claim that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 in respect of her dismissal was well founded. It made a protective award under section 189(3) of the 1992 Act in the claimant's favour.
The award was expressed as a payment equivalent to remuneration for the period of 90 days beginning on 9 May 2022. The decision record also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply to the award and identifies the protected period as the same 90-day period beginning on 9 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The claim was that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULRCA 1992 in respect of dismissal. The tribunal found the claim well founded and made a protective award under section 189(3). The written record does not state a monetary figure for the award, only that it was equivalent to remuneration for 90 days beginning on 9 May 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.