Case 2501499/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J O’Dowd v Highlea Care Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501499/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J O’Dowd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims described in the ET1 as unfair constructive dismissal and disability discrimination arising out of her work as a support worker and her resignation on 14 May 2020. This reserved judgment determined only the preliminary issue of whether she was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material times. The respondent disputed both disability and knowledge, but knowledge was not decided at this hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant had a physical impairment affecting her left knee, including a longstanding anterior cruciate ligament tear and early osteoarthritis. It accepted that by mid-April 2019, after a drive to Eyemouth, she experienced significant pain and swelling, needed breaks while driving, later consulted her GP, and started taking ibuprofen and paracetamol. It also accepted that a later X-ray and medical reports showed early osteoarthritis, and that stair climbing in late 2019 increased pain and swelling.
On that evidence, the tribunal held that the impairment had a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and was likely to last more than 12 months. It found that the claimant was disabled by mid-April 2019 without needing to rely on paragraph 8 of Schedule 1, although it also said that paragraph 8(2) would have applied in the alternative because the condition was likely to result in a substantial adverse effect as it progressed. The tribunal did not accept that she had proved disability from January 2019, and the substantive claims were listed to proceed to final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 from mid-April 2019, but it did not determine the merits of the underlying disability discrimination or constructive dismissal claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 8(2) Equality Act 2010
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle [2009] ICR 1056
- Mowat-Browne v University of Surrey [2002] IRLR 235
- Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of Disability (2011)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.