Case 2501499/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr S Dixon (2) Mr AS Armstrong v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501499/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr S Dixon (2) Mr AS Armstrong
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response and the respondent company's administrators consented to the claims continuing. It found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Low Prudhoe Industrial Estate site, and that both claimants were affected employees who were dismissed as redundant on that date.
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to consult appropriate representatives and provide the written information required by section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found that no independent trade union was recognised for the relevant employees, there were no other employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect representatives for the purposes of section 188.
The Tribunal concluded that the respondent failed to comply with section 188, had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable, and that the complaints were presented in time. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, it found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, so ordered the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 May 2022 for each claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of redundancies. The award was expressed as 90 days' remuneration for each claimant, not as a fixed monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.