Case 2501500/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. H Bramhall v Pathways 4 All Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501500/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC in person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. H Bramhall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Bramhall brought a claim against Pathways 4 All Limited that was recorded in the judgment as unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996. The case was heard at Newcastle CFCTC in person on 22, 23 and 24 April 2024 and 1 and 2 July 2024, with judgment given on 5 September 2024 by Employment Judge Loy sitting alone.
The tribunal’s written decision states only that the claimant’s section 103A unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and failed. The record also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in this published record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records a claim of unfair dismissal contrary to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 and states that it was not well founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.