Case 2501513/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Andrew Sutcliffe v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501513/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrew Sutcliffe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented a response and the judge decided the complaint could be determined on the available material. The respondent company's administrators had consented to the claims continuing.
The tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Trafford Park depot. The claimant was an employee assigned to that depot and was dismissed as redundant on 13 July 2022. There was no recognised independent trade union, no existing authorised employee representatives, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes; the respondent had not invited affected employees to elect such representatives.
The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 in respect of the claimant's dismissal, had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable, and that the claim was presented in time. It held the section 189 complaint well founded and, having regard to the seriousness of the default and GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 13 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of the claimant's redundancy dismissal. The tribunal made a protective award equivalent to 90 days' remuneration, but no monetary amount was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180, [2004] IRLR 400
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.