Case 2501518/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Finn v Middlesbrough DP Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501518/2020
- Decision date
- 4 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Panel members
- Mr E Euers, Miss B Kirby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Finn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural order made by consent at a remote hearing on 23 April 2021 before Employment Judge Aspden, with lay members Mr E Euers and Miss B Kirby. The parties did not object to the case being heard by video, and the tribunal recorded that a face-to-face hearing was unnecessary and not practicable because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The tribunal ordered that the hearing be adjourned and the proceedings stayed until 4 June 2021. The order also provided that, unless either party applied before that date to lift the stay and reinstate the hearing, the proceedings would be treated as dismissed on 4 June 2021 without further order.
No substantive findings were made on the merits of any employment claim in this order, and no remedy was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | No substantive claim was adjudicated in this order. By consent, the Tribunal adjourned and stayed the proceedings until 4 June 2021, with the proceedings to be treated as dismissed on that date unless either party applied to lift the stay and reinstate the hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.