Case 2501529/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mann v Wizard Builders Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501529/2023
- Decision date
- 1 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 30 October 2023, the tribunal gave Mr A Mann an opportunity to make representations as to why his claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal recorded that he failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing to address that issue.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment dated 1 December 2023 records no liability findings on the merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment does not spell out the underlying cause of action, but the case is listed as Unfair Dismissal in the tribunal listing. The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not make sufficient representations against strike out for no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.