Case 2501532/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Hall v Derek Parnaby Cyclones International Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501532/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R Smith
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Mrs D. Winter, Mr K. Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A. Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 7 to 8 June 2023 before Employment Judge T.R Smith, Mrs D. Winter and Mr K. Smith. The claimant, Ms A. Hall, appeared in person and the respondent, Derek Parnaby Cyclones International Limited, was represented by Mr Underwood, consultant.
The written judgment records that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant's complaint of direct sex discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy figures are stated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal as not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records the claimant's complaint of direct sex discrimination as not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.