Case 2501539/2020 · Employment Tribunal
ALEKSAS PACESAS v Joe Davidson T/a Monarch 9 Fabrications — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501539/2020
- Decision date
- 12 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RODGER
- Venue
- TEESSIDE JUSTICE CENTRE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ALEKSAS PACESAS
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 12 October 2021 at Teesside Justice Centre, Employment Judge Rodger sat alone. The respondent failed to file a witness statement and bundle in breach of the order dated 12 January 2021, and did not attend the final hearing. The response and counterclaim were struck out under rules 2, 6, 37 and 47.
The claimant also failed to file further and better particulars of his unfair dismissal claim and did not file a witness statement in breach of the same order. He indicated that he wished to confine the case to unpaid wages. In those circumstances, the claims for unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay and unauthorised deductions from wages were struck out under rules 2, 6 and 37.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unpaid wages claim and entered judgment for £1,014.13. The judgment does not set out any separate apportionment of that sum beyond the overall award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant failed to file further and better particulars and a witness statement in breach of the 12 January 2021 order; the claim was struck out under rules 2, 6 and 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out after the claimant said he wished to confine the case to unpaid wages; the tribunal struck this claim out under rules 2, 6 and 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out after the claimant said he wished to confine the case to unpaid wages; the tribunal struck this claim out under rules 2, 6 and 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as the claim for unpaid wages and enters judgment for £1,014.13. | Upheld | — | £1,014 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,014
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.