Case 2501541/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr DJ Cronin v Flame Heating Spares Ltd (In Administration) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501541/2020
- Decision date
- 15 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr DJ Cronin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr DJ Cronin, worked as a driver/warehouse operative from 24 July 2017 until 6 March 2020. The first respondent, Flame Heating Spares Ltd (In Administration), did not present a response. The administrators told the tribunal on 8 December 2020 that the first respondent had never employed the claimant and that he had been employed by FHS Stockton Ltd. The second respondent was later added to the proceedings, but it also did not present a response by the due date, so the tribunal dealt with the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
In a response dated 10 March 2021, the claimant accepted that his wages and holiday pay complaints were out of time and said he was content for judgment to be entered in his favour on the statutory redundancy payment claim. The tribunal was satisfied that FHS Stockton Ltd was the correct employer and that the claimant’s employment ended by reason of redundancy. It found that the claimant had been employed for two complete years, that he was aged over 41 for each year worked, and that his gross weekly pay at termination was £349.61. On that basis, the statutory redundancy payment was calculated at £1,048.83.
The judgment therefore dismissed the claims against the first respondent, upheld the statutory redundancy payment claim against the second respondent, and recorded the unlawful deduction of wages claim and the holiday pay complaint as dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was employed by the Second Respondent, that his employment ended by reason of redundancy, and that he had two complete years' service. It accepted a gross weekly pay of £349.61 and calculated statutory redundancy pay at £1,048.83. | Upheld | — | £1,049 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. In his response dated 10 March 2021, the claimant said this complaint was out of time. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint for accrued but untaken holiday pay under Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations is recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal. In his response dated 10 March 2021, the claimant said this complaint was out of time. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,049
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.