Case 2501545/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Samantha Belcher v Crown and Country Leisure Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501545/2021
- Decision date
- 22 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Samantha Belcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSamantha Belcher was employed by Crown and Country Leisure Limited as a Cleaner from 9 May 2004 until 25 June 2021. The Respondent did not present a response, and Employment Judge Sweeney proceeded under rule 21 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure on the material available. The judgment records that the Claimant was aged 38 at dismissal, earned £300 gross per week and £271.50 net, and had three continuous years of service.
The tribunal found four claims well founded: a statutory redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, unpaid accrued holiday pay under regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1996, unlawful deduction of wages under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of furlough pay, and wrongful dismissal for notice pay. It accepted that furlough pay had not been paid from 22 March 2020 and that, by termination, 14 weeks of furlough pay at £264.20 per week remained outstanding. It also accepted that the Claimant had received no notice of dismissal and was entitled to 12 weeks' notice at her net weekly rate.
The tribunal calculated the redundancy entitlement at £4,950, holiday pay at £811.80 for 90 hours at £9.02 per hour, the wage deduction claim at £3,698.80, and wrongful dismissal damages at £3,258. It ordered the Respondent to pay those sums, making a total award of £12,718.60.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,950 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £812 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,699 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,258 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,719
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 21 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.