Case 2501548/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms S Woodward (2) G Hordern (3) S Johnson v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501548/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms S Woodward (2) G Hordern (3) S Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response and the respondent company's administrators consented to the claims continuing. It found each claimant's complaint well founded under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, on the basis that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of their dismissals.
The Tribunal found that, as at 6 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Rokeby Court, Runcorn depot and 20 or more employees at the Trafford Park depot. The claimants were affected employees and were dismissed as redundant on 6 May 2022. There was no recognised independent trade union for the relevant employee description, no existing representatives with authority to consult, and no section 188 representatives elected because the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect them.
The Tribunal found the respondent had not shown special circumstances making compliance with section 188 not reasonably practicable, and that the claims were presented in time. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, it found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 6 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award complaint under section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of redundancy dismissals. The award is remuneration for 90 days for each claimant, but no monetary figure is stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180, [2004] IRLR 400
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.