Case 2501551/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Steptoe v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501551/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Steptoe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented a response and the company administrators had consented to the claim continuing. On the available material, the Tribunal found that as at 9 May 2022 the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at its Trafford Park depot, and that the claimant was an affected employee who was dismissed as redundant on 15 May 2022.
The Tribunal found that the respondent was required to consult appropriate representatives and provide the information required by section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. There was no recognised independent trade union for the claimant's employee description, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and no representatives elected for section 188 purposes; the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect such representatives.
The Tribunal held that the respondent failed to comply with section 188, had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable, and that the complaint was presented in time. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and the guidance in GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, the Tribunal found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 15 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements under section 188; judgment awards 90 days' remuneration but does not state a monetary amount. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.