Ms Z Mezoh v Breeze Support Solutions Ltd — 2026

Regional Employment Judge Davies determined Ms Z Mezoh's claims against Breeze Support Solutions Ltd under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The respondent submitted its ET3 response late, and it was rejected because no application for an extension of time accompanied it. No further response or application was made. The judge was satisfied that a determination could properly be made on the available material.

The tribunal upheld the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages for underpaid wages and sponsorship costs. It awarded £3,822.61 net for underpaid wages from 24 June 2025 to 29 September 2025, with the respondent responsible for any tax and National Insurance due, and £889 for deductions relating to Certificate of Sponsorship and related costs. The claimant's weekly wage was £500 gross and £421.28 net.

The breach of contract complaint concerning travel expenses succeeded, with £52.62 awarded for unpaid mileage. The tribunal also upheld the complaint concerning holiday accrued but untaken when employment ended and awarded £755 gross. The claimant was responsible for any tax and National Insurance due on the holiday pay. The judgment recorded that the claim form did not include a claim for notice pay.

The respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began. The tribunal found no exceptional circumstances making an award of two weeks' pay unjust or inequitable, but found that four weeks' pay would not be just and equitable. It awarded £1,000 for that failure, bringing the total payable to £6,519.23.