Case 2501579/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D McNally v Cape Engineering Services Offshore Ltd t/a Altrad Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501579/2020
- Decision date
- 28 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Ms Kirby, Ms S Mee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D McNally
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 17 and 20-24 June 2022, before Employment Judge Jeram with lay members Ms Kirby and Ms S Mee, Mr D McNally brought claims against Cape Engineering Services Offshore Ltd t/a Altrad Services. The written judgment is brief and records the final outcomes only.
The tribunal stated that the unfair dismissal and unauthorised deduction from wages claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. It also held that the direct disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments claims were not well founded and dismissed them.
No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment. The note to the judgment says reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual process.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the direct disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments claims were not well founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.