Case 2501594/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Donaghue v Mane Avenue 89 Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501594/2020
- Decision date
- 5 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Donaghue
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Donaghue brought complaints against Mane Avenue 89 Limited including unlawful disability discrimination and unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, so there was no merits determination on that issue.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was found to be well-founded and succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,412.64, described as a net amount, and stated that the respondent would be responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions payable on it.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unlawful disability discrimination was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint well-founded and ordered payment of £1,412.64 net, with the respondent responsible for any income tax and national insurance contributions due on that amount. | Upheld | — | £1,413 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,413
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.