Case 2501602/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Brightey v Redde Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501602/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Panel members
- Ms B Kirby, Mr S Moule
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Brightey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed Mrs R Brightey’s claim for ordinary constructive unfair dismissal. The judgment records no monetary award in relation to that claim.
The tribunal also found that Redde Limited failed to notify her of the decision on her flexible working request within the 3-month decision period required by Employment Rights Act 1996 s.80G(1)(aa). That claim was found well founded, and the tribunal awarded £1,459.16, described in the judgment as 4 weeks’ pay, as compensation for the failure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claim for ordinary constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Flexible working | The tribunal found the respondent failed to notify the claimant of the decision on her flexible working request within the 3-month decision period under Employment Rights Act 1996 s.80G(1)(aa) and awarded £1,459.16, described as 4 weeks’ pay, in compensation. | Upheld | — | £1,459 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,459
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.80G(1)(aa)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.