Case 2501605/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Patterson v E.D. Nunnerley Limited Heard: Remotely (by video link) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501605/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Patterson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 7 June 2021, at a remote hearing by video link before Employment Judge S Shore, the parties agreed terms of settlement. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to E.D. Nunnerley Limited.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of unauthorised deduction of wages (holiday pay) and breach of contract (notice pay), together with the respondent's employer's contract claim, were stayed until 12:00pm on Monday 5 July 2021. If no application was made by either party to relist the claims for hearing by that date, both the claimant's and respondent's claims were to be struck out in their entirety without further reference to either party or to an Employment Judge.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No substantive merits findings or monetary award are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claimant's claim described as unauthorised deduction of wages (holiday pay). The parties agreed settlement terms and the claim was stayed pending the terms in the judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim for notice pay. The parties agreed settlement terms and the claim was stayed pending the terms in the judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's employer's contract claim. The parties agreed settlement terms and the claim was stayed pending the terms in the judgment. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.