Case 2501609/2021 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance or v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501609/2021
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
1 namedClaimant
No appearance or
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent as a Coroner and Claims Officer from 25 June 2018 until his dismissal with effect from 19 January 2023. In case 2501609/2021 he alleged detriments for having made protected disclosures contrary to section 47B ERA 1996. In case 2502444/2022 he alleged automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A ERA 1996 or, alternatively, ordinary unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 98 ERA 1996.
The claimant did not attend the five-day final hearing and had not given advance notice or responded to the tribunal's attempts to contact him. The tribunal recorded that he had repeatedly failed to engage, had not complied with orders requiring him to confirm whether he would attend or seek a postponement, and had previously been debarred from advancing evidence in relation to the second claim.
After considering rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the available papers, the respondent's wish for the claims to be heard in public, and the overriding objective, Employment Judge Loy dismissed both claims because the claimant failed to attend or be represented. No substantive findings were made on the merits of either claim and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend or be represented at the final hearing; no merits findings were made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim for automatic unfair dismissal under section 103A ERA 1996, or alternatively ordinary unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 98 ERA 1996, dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or participate. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.