Case 2501627/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S-L Beswick v Amna Care Domiciliary Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501627/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S-L Beswick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss S-L Beswick’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded. It held that Amna Care Domiciliary Ltd had failed to pay wages for work done between 29 June 2020 and 9 July 2020, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The amount deducted from wages was £1,214.69, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay that sum to the claimant.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s complaint for unpaid holiday pay under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well founded. The judgment records that the parties agreed the amount due for holiday pay was £475.25, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay that sum. The hearing was conducted remotely by video because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,215 |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,690
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.