Case 2501633/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Affleck v Panoramic Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501633/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Affleck
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 8 December 2022, Employment Judge McCluskey considered Mr R Affleck’s claims against Panoramic Services Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages and compensation arising therefrom, and for holiday pay. The tribunal held that both claims were out of time.
The tribunal further found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented these claims in time. On that basis, the unlawful deduction from wages claim, the associated compensation claim, and the holiday pay claim were dismissed.
The decision records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held this claim, including compensation arising therefrom, was out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held this claim was out of time and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.