Case 2501639/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Craig Henderson v Utility Alliance Limited (in Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501639/2020
- Decision date
- 23 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Garnon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Craig Henderson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningCraig Henderson was employed by Utility Alliance Limited from 1 June 2017 to 14 August 2020. He resigned on 23 July 2020 and remained on garden leave until termination. After the respondent entered administration, consent to continue was obtained from the administrator on 15 June 2021, but the administrator took no part in the hearing. Judge Garnon proceeded under rule 47 of the ET Rules 2013 and treated the claimant's 11 December 2020 email as his witness statement.
On the dismissal issue, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and found that the matters described in his statement amounted to a fundamental breach of contract. It held that, without reasonable and proper cause, the respondent had conducted itself in a manner calculated or likely to seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust. The tribunal therefore found the unfair constructive dismissal complaint well founded and made a basic award only. The claimant was 38 years old at dismissal, had three complete years of service, and his gross weekly pay was capped at £538 for the basic award calculation, producing £1,614.
The tribunal also upheld two money claims. For holiday pay, it found that 17.5 days' holiday had accrued in the final 12 months, including five days bought under the annual leave purchase scheme, and awarded £3,352.47 gross at a daily rate of £191.57. For arrears of pay, it accepted that July 2020 gross pay due was £4,626.54 and that £2,777.13 was due for 1 to 14 August 2020. The headnote orders £7,403.85 gross for that claim, although the reasons state £7,103.75 when the arithmetic is set out. Taken together, the ordered sums in the headnote total £12,370.32.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment headnote said the unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the reasons identified and analysed the complaint as unfair constructive dismissal. The tribunal found a fundamental breach of contract without reasonable and proper cause and awarded a basic award only, calculated on three complete years' service at the capped weekly pay of £538. | Upheld | — | £1,614 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal upheld the claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay at termination. It found 17.5 days' annual leave had accrued in the 12 months ending with termination, including five purchased days, and applied a daily rate of £191.57. | Upheld | — | £3,352 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the arrears of pay claim for July 2020 and 1 to 14 August 2020. The headnote orders £7,403.85 gross, but the reasons state £7,103.75 when setting out the arithmetic, so the extracted text is internally inconsistent on this figure. | Upheld | — | £7,404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,370
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,614
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.