Case 2501640/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Cousins v Tesco plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501640/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Cousins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 12 January 2022 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had not responded to Tribunal correspondence, had not complied with orders made on 19 October 2021, and had failed to pursue the claim actively. It found that she had not made sufficient representations as to why the claim should not be struck out, and cancelled the hearing fixed for 15 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim for failure to respond, comply with orders, and actively pursue it. The judgment text does not particularise the claim; the classification reflects the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claim for failure to respond, comply with orders, and actively pursue it. The judgment text does not particularise the claim; the classification reflects the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.