Case 2501651/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mitan v 24/7 People Solutions Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501651/2023
- Decision date
- 25 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O'Dempsey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mitan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Newcastle by CVP on 25 September 2023 before Employment Judge O'Dempsey Date. The claimant did not attend. The judgment records that the tribunal made inquiries but no reasons for the claimant's non-attendance were available.
In those circumstances, and on the information available to the judge, the tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's complaints. The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint(s).
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the notice at the end of the judgment. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's complaints after no reasons for the claimant's non-attendance were available and inquiries had been made. The extracted judgment does not specify any separate head(s) of claim beyond the case listing category. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.