Case 2501658/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Hudson v 4Thewkend Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501658/2023
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Dempsey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Hudson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Hudson brought a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages against 4Thewkend Limited. The tribunal record says she had been employed as a bartender from 3 March 2023 to 12 May 2023 and was paid £10.20 an hour. She said her former employer had failed to pay her for the final four weeks of her employment.
The tribunal noted that the claim was first served at the address given on the ET1, which was not the respondent’s registered office, and that no response was returned. After a preliminary hearing on 27 September 2023, Employment Judge O’Dempsey amended the respondent’s name and directed re-service at the registered office. No ET3 was then returned either.
The tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and considered the documents supplied by the claimant, including wage slips and her letter of 12 October 2023 identifying deductions from pay on 5 July 2023 and 5 August 2023. On that material, the tribunal accepted that she had worked the hours claimed, that the sums were properly payable, that they had not been paid, and that there was no contractual or other authorisation for the deductions.
The tribunal found that in the last four weeks of employment she worked 73 hours without being paid for that work, and that she had also been underpaid by £89 in March and April. It held that the unpaid amounts formed a series of deductions and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £833.60.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £833.60. | Upheld | — | £834 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £834
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.