Case 2501661/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Susan Hall v VKYB Enterprises Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501661/2020
- Decision date
- 12 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Susan Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat remotely by CVP at Newcastle CFCTC on 12 January 2021 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were not well-founded and were dismissed. No factual findings or claim-specific analysis are set out in the extracted text beyond that outcome.
The record also notes that this was a Rule 21 judgment and that reasons had been given orally at the hearing. It states that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not well-founded and dismissed. The specific heads of claim are not listed in the extracted judgment text and are inferred from the gov.uk listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were not well-founded and dismissed. The specific heads of claim are not listed in the extracted judgment text and are inferred from the gov.uk listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.