Case 2501680/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hall v Cleveland Bridge UK Limited (in administration) and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501680/2021
- Decision date
- 28 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
Parties
4 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had previously written to the claimant on 22 December 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.