Case 2501694/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Davis v CDC Holdings (Yarm) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501694/2023
- Decision date
- 12 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Davis, brought a complaint against CDC Holdings (Yarm) Ltd that deductions had been made from his wages in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal held that complaint well founded, including so far as it related to unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £966.74, described as the amount that remained owing, subject to any deductions for tax and national insurance that the respondent was required by law to make and pay over to HMRC. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the complaint well founded under section 13 ERA 1996 in respect of unpaid wages, including holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £967 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £967
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.