Case 2501699/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Harper v Teleperformance limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501699/2022
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Harper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Harper brought a claim of unlawful deduction of wages against Teleperformance Limited. At the hearing on 21 August 2024, Employment Judge Sweeney refused an application to amend the claim form to include further complaints listed in the Case Management Orders of 2 November 2023.
The tribunal held that the ET1 was presented on 2 November 2022 and that the unlawful deduction of wages claim relating to the pay period ending October 2021 was out of time. It found that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory time period.
The unlawful deduction of wages claim and the proceedings under case number 2501699/2022 were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim in respect of the pay period ending October 2021 was presented out of time. It found that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the statutory time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.