Case 2501701/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Currie v Costain Engineering & Construction Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2501701/2024
- Decision date
- 10 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Currie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public on 10 January 2025 before Employment Judge Morris sitting alone, conducted remotely by CVP. The claimant, Mr M Currie, was neither present nor represented. The respondent, Costain Engineering & Construction Limited, was represented by Ms J Charalambous of Counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal rules or orders of the Tribunal and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim under rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal rules or orders and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.